Predicting performance according to the F.L.S program in terms of positive energy among basketball players
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58305/ejsst.v14i50.417Keywords:
performance prediction, F.L.S program, positive energy, basketballAbstract
The positive energy of the members of the basketball team is one of the important elements that motivates the team, like the strength of one man. Positive energy contributes to pushing the basketball player to love competition, no matter how difficult, strong, or intense it is. Therefore, positive energy is the most important ingredient for the success of the basketball team, and a team that has energy Positive: He can cope with difficulties and compete with teams or competitors stronger than him in order to benefit from the point of confrontation between them as experience or victory over them as a result of the love of competition and their possession of this important component in the team. From all of the above, the current study will work to answer a group of questions, including:
1-Is there a correlation between prediction and positive energy among basketball players in Iraq?
2-Are there direct effects of prediction on the positive energy of basketball players in Iraq?
The research population was determined from players in the Iraqi Premier Basketball League registered in the records of the Central Basketball Federation, numbering (132) players, distributed among the (excellent) sports teams. The researcher built a positive energy scale to achieve the intended purpose of measuring positive energy among basketball players. To be a tool for measuring it among players in sports. The researchers concluded:
1-The results showed that the differences in the positive energy scale and its dimensions were significant and in favor of the achieved arithmetic mean.
2-The results in the positive energy scale showed that the dimension of happiness and optimism was ranked first, achievement motivation was ranked second, emotional stability was ranked third, and positive thinking was ranked fourth.
3-The results showed that the differences in predicting performance were significant and in favor of the achieved arithmetic mean.
